Preterism

Why Preterism Is An Enemy To Church Freedom

Preterism is less a position about the End Times than it is an effort at end-time prophesy deconstruction. Its bolder proponents seek to spoil the hope in Christ's return for the church at large, purporting that all prophetic events had occurred shortly after the Resurrection of Jesus, leaving nothing for the church to expect in the future other than continued societal disarray at the hands of the Prince of This World.

"Why do you think that Preterism is an enemy to church freedom when its proponents claim to be Christians?"

The answer lies in the Preterist goal. If a member of the church of God believes that his religious freedom, based on any specific Biblical prophesy regarding the End Times, is being threatened or diminished, the Preterist considers the matter to be a waste of time or even heretical. He tends to ridicule, mock, scorn, or take an active position to thwart the cause of the futurist. In any case, anti-Christian activity is the motus operandi, no matter how innocuous it seems.

That which they offer in place of an end-time position primarily focuses on a denial of the main passages the Church has used since its inception to speak authoritatively on the topic of end times!

Think for a moment what commitment the Preterist would have to promote the cause of a futurist in court as he seeks remedy from persecution. A secular judge, attorney or jurist would likely have little qualm to consider the opinion of the futurist, even if he thought the issue was based on myth. However, a Preterist is pressed against his own opinion which is diametrically opposed with the futurist. Fairness would mean giving credence and consideration to someone he considers a heretic.

In general matters of Christian persecution, such as prayer in school, religious t-shirts, Bibles in libraries, etc., the Preterist seems united with the futurist for cause, but there is no Preterist parallel to the unique persecution the futurist suffers. He escapes for lack of concern for end-times issues; a position from which to gloat over his opponent.

The Nature of Preterism

If your quest is to find an alternate meaning to the Gospel of Hope, an endless exegesis obfuscating the obvious, there is an abundance of it on the net. Have at it. This article offers a simple means to handle Preterist advocates and to perhaps help initiates that have not been glazed over with religious stupor.

The JW Analogy

When encountering Jehovah's Witnesses, studied believers are wise to test the sincerity of 'openness' presented at their doorstep by doctrinal trainees. The defender of Christ's divinity realizes that a true discussion is not possible with JWs in most cases, and will resort to a test of reason:

"Do you accept that the single-letter article 'a' was added to the Gospel of John by your religion's founder?"

The Watchtower's insertion of the article has been substantially repudiated by the world’s best New Testament Greek scholars. If a dialog cannot resolve that it was, your visitation should be terminated by handing the proselyte an article discussing the inception of the JWs, the nature of their founder, and how the group has altered the Bible to suit it's doctrine. Unfortunately, any opposition to Watchtower propaganda is considered direct persecution by Satan, so your offerings will likely be avoided like the plague.

Should the proselyte asks further earnest questions without parroting propaganda, one must determine if s/he is trying to overcome bias or ignorance.

Discussion of hope with a Preterist is like a damp towel after an ice-cold shower. Partial Preterists - confused enough to offer a warm towel.

Forgoing Contention

So it is with the Preterist. Should the conversation mire with contextual argument, time is better spent having them research grammatical rules on their own. The test:

"Do you believe that the object of Irenaeus' statement about what was seen at the end of Domition's reign was John's vision, or John himself?"

If the answer is "John" the conversation cannot move ahead until the respondent passes remedial classes in grammar and logic.

To The Subverting Of The Hearers

14Of these things put them in remembrance, charging them before the Lord that they strive not about words to no profit, but to the subverting of the hearers. 15Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. 16But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness. 17And their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus; 18Who concerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the faith of some. 19Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his. And, Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity. - Paul, 2 Timothy 14-19, circa A.D. 66 or 67

Paradox or Paradise

From Last Days to Past Days

The preterist denies any future fulfillment of the book of Revelation and purports that the apocalyptic events written by John were fulfilled within the first century after Christ. This hypothesis enjoys conflict with normal dating methodology, but nothing that a twist of reasoning can’t remedy.

In their view, after obscuring a few simple facts, there isn't much to look forward to: the Great Book is closed to two thousand years of left-behinders following one short generation of raptured true believers … vanished, no mention, without leaving a trace of existence. The future is lackluster, without promise for the abandoned, the non-true believers. Evidently, Jesus never showed up for all to see as promised. Blame it on surgical exegetics, but paradise never looked so grim.

The Long List

Problem:

Did the Creator leave us a forensic nightmare in 70 A.D. with two millennia of trial and tribulation to follow? Did He spin up great expectations of end-time events only to secretly fulfill prophetic statements by Jesus and the Apostles, yet causing them to appear errant in their proclaiming the times to come? This seems to be the theme with religions that hijack the common understanding of Scriptures and their obvious meanings. First they cause you to doubt what you have read, then demean the writer and his cause. Once the basis for understanding is mangled their hearers are open to any suggestions, even if they are contrary-wise to their own position.

A double minded man is unstable in all his ways. - James 1:8

    It would seem that if events, such as:
  • Reformation of the Israeli State
  • Rapture of Believers
  • People side-by-side disappearing
  • Rise of the Antichrist
  • Two fire-breathing witnesses left dead in the streets for days
  • World-wide gift-giving to celebrate their demise
  • The witnesses are resurrected
  • Mark of the Beast brands all people
  • World-wide restrictive commercial system established
  • Angels blowing trumpets
  • All mankind witnesses the second coming of Christ
  • Resurrection of the dead
  • Transformation of the living
  • Jesus ruling in Jerusalem
  • Judgment Day for everyone

had taken place that someone would have been so moved as to carve it in stone, or inscribe it on a copper plate for the angel Moroni to deliver by now. Where are the cave drawings and scrolls!

Solution:

We have futurist statements from Apostle John’s student lineage, decades after 70 A.D. … anticipating … speculating ... the Antichrist is yet to come, and all that 666 business.

So the list is pending, not fulfilled.

No ordinary fix

Just as a cult positions itself to gain control over the unwitting, a parallel reality is fashioned with circular logic to keep them mesmerized.

In the case of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, add a single-letter word to the Book of John. Voila! Jesus becomes a creation, a lesser god. Declare the Holy Spirit to be a thing and a self-defined religion is born. Efficient! Genius.

Alright, someone new aspiring to try their hand at this shifts a date, wrangles a single word regarding John’s apocalyptic vision, ignores a set of events that create a crucial time-frame … the advent of Preterism. Mission accomplished.

It took a smidgen of whiteout, a revised calendar, convoluted rationale and exegesis ad infinitum to keep the captive captivated. Not as efficient, but effective. B+for trying.

The squeaky hinge, easy to grease

For the Preterist everything pivots on Matthew 16 and 24; the basis for initial arguments foist upon the unwitting. In the article "A New Way to Introduce Your Friends to Preterism", the author says:

For the individual, stupor. For the group, fear locks them in subtle hysteria.

"... Matt. 16:27-28 ... is printed out in full, concluding with the words "there are some standing here who shall not taste death till they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom." Since they agreed that God does not lie, mislead or deceive, this verse begins to shake them up a bit. Next, they are confronted with the "this generation" phrase of Matt. 24:34, followed by a "yes" or "no" question as to whether these two Scriptures have been fulfilled or not, in view of the first century targeted fulfillment time just alluded to. This makes him think ... he immediately senses that all of this is new and strange to him, he is encouraged to read on about what Preterism is all about and how most of us have been taught the futurist view in our churches. In this setting, what your friend is learning is that a 2000 year delay in fulfilling these promises of Jesus just doesn't make sense. Even worse, the very trustworthiness of the Bible is at stake!"

Sounds a bit divisive. Note that their goal is to make the victim question his faith, God and the Bible to introduce a "new and strange" truth. The technique is similar to Jehovah's Witnesses targeting people steeped in meaningless ritual having not read the Bible in order to dominate the victim with half-wit reasoning and fear of lost salvation.

Let's look at their two crucial arguments, and leave the rest to a healthy Internet search.

First, Matthew 27 - 28:

For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works. 28 Verily I say unto you, there be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.

Verse 27: Before His crucifixion, Jesus makes it clear that He would return "with the angels" to judge "every man", not just those existing prior to 70 A.D. That was never fulfilled, otherwise the world would have been cleansed of all evil and things would be much different today. Chalk one up for the futurist.

Verse 28: Without wrangling words, no damage is done to recognize the private return of Jesus to the Apostles after His resurrection as fulfilment. Remember the episode where Thomas challenged the appearance of Christ? Perhaps the Preterist would do himself justice to settle the matter as Thomas did, and simply bow the knee. Christ returned to His audience as He promised. This was not with the angels (v. 27), but it definitely was in His kingdom.

Christ's early appearance in Matthew 28 demonstrated to the disciples that He would be resurrected as foretold, and that their hope was not in vain; our hope. Without, Christianity would be another false religion. Chalk two ...

This desert topping had just as much promise to the Lord's audience as would a motivational speaker predicting that his audience would become millionaires with his sales plan, and not only that, some sales people will have over a hundred thousand dollars in their accounts by year's end. We've heard it on Saturday infomercials. It's not uncommon in normal speech ... no exegetics required to understand the obvious. The visitation happened as promised and the apostles, even Thomas, would eventually testify unto death of the Lord's Resurrection.

Next, Matthew 24:34

Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.

It doesn't matter that you point out the simplicity of the error, members of both groups ignore it and say their minds are made up.

Looks harmless enough by itself. Add that to any random short-list and perchance you might make a valid argument. But there's a long list of events, with conditions, that precedes that statement delivered by Jesus Himself, so it can't be attributed to some "senile apostle" hypothesis. It's in plain speech without allegory or parable. The "generation" spoken of is that generation which experiences ALL of the Olivet long-list, not the Preterist short-list. Chalk three and we're done.

The Preterist Paradox

The Preterist posits that the abandoned church were not true believers whose testimony should not be relied upon, yet they use the testimony of those living after 70 A.D. for argument.

John lived for another 25+ years after his "apocalyptic vision" was fulfilled, yet Jesus purportedly returned in 70 AD. John never wrote or preached about the fulfillment of his vision in those remaining years. He was left behind when supposedly all true-believers were called up to be with Christ. If he was abandoned, then he was not a true-believer and his apocalyptic vision could not have been true. Therefore, the entire Preterist reliance on his vision is an act of futility and circular logic.

The Preterist depends heavily on the destruction of the temple to kick start prophesy fulfillment, though it was the second time the temple had been destroyed with the Jews removed from their homeland. In light of the Jews currently preparing to rebuild the temple for the third time, and this after a recent re-establishment of a physical Israeli State, with more accurate and visible fulfillment of other facets of the vision, wouldn't you think the Preterist would drop their fragmented and virtual arguments for the real thing?

Well, it's hard for the Jehovah's Witnesses to admit that the word "a" was not in the original Book of John, and equally hard for Mormons to admit their founder was a treasure hunter, so consider it to be the nature of the self-proclaimed Preterit religion.

The advent of many other paradoxical establishments in the past century is just another fulfillement of end-times prophesy, which seems to have Preterism in tow.

Historical Parallel

The "future was then and gone" hypothesis dredges the pool of history for similarities between past events and future prophecy. That same dredging exhumes a Jewish Sadducee sect that had similar beliefs to Preterism. Jesus challenged the reliability of their interpretation of Biblical doctrine. Furthermore, Matthew depicts them as a “brood of vipers,” and a perversion of the true Israel. The Sadducee believed, in part:

  • no resurrection of the dead
  • no spirit realm
  • they were true Israel.
Most Preterists continue to partake of the Lord's Supper regardless that Paul said the eating and drinking serves to "proclaim the Lord's death UNTIL HE COMES"
(1 Corinthians 11:26)

Is it coincidence that the preterist declares that their transformed church of God has been in serious error for thousands of years, a people requiring enlightenment? The folly becomes apparent: If Jesus had fulfilled John's vision, then why are transformed people left in the dark about the transformation until the Preterists come on the scene? Nothing has changed pre/post 70 A.D. The argument is not unlike that of the Jehovah's Witnesses.

Mass and Deliberate Ignorance

The masses seem to have totally forgotten the incredible events that took place which was to be witnessed by all. When two are at the threshing floor and one disappears, there is no doubt there would be a lasting report of such an occurrence. However, several decades after John's revelation ... nothing.

Imagine today what we can remember in great detail from one, two, three, even four decades ago. If there had been a mass disappearance, you would surely scratch it into the rocks for posterity, yet ... nothing. There is mention of the temple being destroyed and the Jews scattered, but no fantastic Day of the Lord is ever mentioned. 

Vandals of Hope

The Preterist dichotomy of 'imminent hypothesis' eventually consumes hope and eliminates a bright future for the saints. What joy to be caught in a black-hole of despair sparked by ingenious ignorance and stupidity; Pauline terms intended to comfort, not affront.

Copyright 2011 Preterism.