Admission of Discrimination

Evidence

A Secretary of State affidavit form plus a series of Freedom of Information Act requests, with consequent replies, from State licensing departments demonstrate that Illinois practices religious discrimination by underinclusion1

Jesse White FOIA Requests and Responses

JesseFOIA 1 - Il Secretary State
FOIA 2 - Il Secretary State
FOIA 3 - Il Secretary State
Reply 1 - Il Secretary State
Reply 2 - Il Secretary State

Membership Required

Applicants are denied civil privileges: The State mandates that the applicant must be a member of a religious group with a leader that can attest to the applicant's personal religious opinion as well as to similar convictions held by the religious order/sect.

Incongruous Testimonies

Applicants are denied civil privileges because their personal religious opinions may not conform to that of other members of a denomination. Due to association, they are held to an establishment of religion that may or may not support a popular and faith-based conviction.

Entrapment

In order to disqualify applicants, a typical question posed to the leader of an applicant's religious group is:

Have any members of your organization ever applied for, or currently use, Social Security numbers?

An affirmative answer signifies that other members of the religious group do not have the same deeply held convictions as the applicant. Consequently, the applicant is disqualified due to a lack of common opinion, and his civil rights are denied.

Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation FOIA REquests and Responses

deptprofregFOIA - Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation 
Reply - Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation


1  Justice J. Harlan, U. S. Supreme Court, Welsh v. United States, 1970.

This web site is provided for "information purposes" only and should not be relied upon as "legal advice". This information is provided for educational, speculative, and historical discussion only and merely constitutes opinion or personal perspective protected under the First Amendment. Nothing transmitted from this web site constitutes the establishment of an attorney-client relationship. Nothing within this site is intended to unlawfully influence any attorney, litigant, or member of the congressional, judicial or executive branches, or to incite, coerce, extort, undermine or manipulate any governmental, individual, commercial or legal entity. Applicability of any legal principles or analysis discussed on this site or any of its pages may differ substantially in individual situations or in different states.

This web site, information providers, and web host have no control over, nor do they endorse, any external internet site, email, electronic document, or hard copy that contains links to, copies of, or references to this information.

This is not a commercial enterprise, nor is any information presented here to solicit funds or donations of any kind. Donations are strictly free will, for educational purposes and the furtherance of religious freedom.

Copyright 2011 Admission of Discrimination.